Courtiers Wealth Management
Courtiers Wealth Management

News & Insights

Could we fix interest rates by spending more?

While Catherine Mann and Megan Greene at the Monetary Policy Committee have put forward their views on interest rates and UK spending, Gary Reynolds, CIO, discusses how taking a more Keynesian approach could help the economy. His advice has history on its side, with the New Deal and Great Recession showing how Keynesian economics works.

The Monetary Policy Committee’s stance

Recently, Catherine Mann and Megan Greene of the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) published papers on UK inflation, focused around how to get the rate to 2%. While Mann suggested raising the Bank Rate by 0.25%, Greene suggests maintaining it at 5.25%. Gary calls these views ‘conservative with a small c’, with the MPC citing that an increase in real incomes is an inflationary threat. Tell that to the van driver with two kids and trying to make ends meet!
The MPC’s response is to keep interest rates high, which doesn’t make sense to Gary. Instead, Gary suggests we look to America, where they are doing more for the average worker, and getting economic growth because of it. They have the Inflation Reduction Act and Medicare (although we have the NHS our side of the pond), and have invested in businesses, boosting jobs – and those jobs have better pay. When you give working families money, they spend it, funnelling it back into the economy because they need that new car, better phone, holiday, or essentials.

US’ economic growth works on Keynes’ theory.

What is Keynes’ theory?

John Maynard Keynes, an early 20th-century British economist was the father of modern macroeconomics and Keynesian economics. He published his theory in “The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money.” in February 1936, stating that governments should be increasing spending (in infrastructure, unemployment benefits and education), stimulating demand and boosting growth as consumer demand is the primary driver for an economy.


Historic examples:

New Deal

The Great Depression was the catalyst for Keynes’ economic theories, and the US New Deal is arguably the most famous example of Keynesian economics in play.
President Franklin D Roosevelt increased debt by $3 billion to create 15 new agencies and laws in his first 100 days in office. With the Works Progress Administration putting 8.5 million people to work and the Civil Works Administration creating four million new construction jobs, it shows how government intervention can stimulate the national economy.

Great Recession
Between 2007 – 2009, Presidents George W Bush and then Barack Obama reflected Keynesian economic theory in several ways, including the Economic Stimulus Act. Spending $224 billion covering extended unemployment benefits, healthcare (as well as introducing Obamacare to slow the growth of healthcare costs) and education, and creating jobs through $275 billion of federal contracts, grants and loans while cutting taxes by $288 billion.

What should we be doing?

Gary offers an easy cycle for what the Government and MPC could be doing to help the economy and families using Keynesian Economics, which he coins the ‘Virtuous Economic Cycle’:

The Keynesian Economic Cycle

Unfortunately, we currently have an ‘unvirtuous’ economic circle with an MPC that doesn’t see spending like this as at all positive.

“They [the MPC] don’t see themselves as having real responsibility for trying to improve the average output per head in this country. They see their sole responsibility as getting inflation to –and staying at – 2%.” Gary Reynolds, CIO.

In summary:

We were in a technical recession at the end of last year with two quarters of negative growth, so the Government have put some legislation in place to push things along and help – for example, cutting employee National Insurance means cutting tax on jobs, which is a good thing and will put more money in people’s pockets, but it would be helpful if the Government and MPC did more, maybe taking some tips from Keynes in the process.

Important information

Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The value of investments, and the income from them, can go down as well as up and is not guaranteed and you may not get back the amount originally invested. Any forecast, projection or target where provided is indicate only and is not guaranteed in any way. Certain types of funds might carry a greater investment risk than other investment funds. Further details of the risks are associated with investing in Courtiers funds can be found in the Key Investor Information Document or Prospectus, copies of which are available on request or at


This communication is for information purposes only and should not be relied upon in making an investment decision. The views expressed by individuals and the business are based on market conditions at the date of issue and are subject to change without notice. The mention of any stocks or shares should not be taken as recommendation to deal and does not take into account the individual investor’s investment objective or risk profile. Where an investment or security is denominated in a different currency to the investor’s currency of reference, changes in rates of exchange may have an adverse effect on the value, price or income of or from that investment to the investor. Any third party sites, or pages which are linked to the document, have not been reviewed by us and therefore we accept no responsibility for the authors or content of external link or pages. If you are interested in any of Courtiers Asset Management Limited’s range of funds, or require any financial advice, please speak to a financial adviser.

Issued by Courtiers Asset Management Limited, CAM0423926. Courtiers Asset Management Limited is Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority – Register No: 616322. Address: 18 Hart Street, Henley-on-Thames, Oxfordshire RG9 2AU. Tel: 01491 578368.

Share Article

Subscribe to News & Insights

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.